If you’ve been charged with drug driving while taking legitimately prescribed medication, you’re not alone – and you may have strong legal defences. Thousands of UK drivers take prescription medications for genuine medical conditions, unaware that drugs like morphine, diazepam, methadone, temazepam, and even medical cannabis can result in drug driving charges despite being legally prescribed and taken as directed. At Scarsdale Solicitors, our specialist prescription drug driving defence team protects patients whose legitimate medication use has led to criminal charges.
The law recognises that many controlled drugs serve legitimate medical purposes. While Section 5A Road Traffic Act makes it an offence to drive with specified drugs above certain limits, the legislation sets higher “road safety risk” limits for prescription medications compared to illegal drugs, acknowledging therapeutic use. However, even legitimate prescriptions don’t guarantee immunity from prosecution – if your blood levels exceed specified limits, you can still be charged. This is where expert legal prescription defence becomes essential. Learn more about our comprehensive criminal defence services.
Don’t accept a drug driving conviction simply because you tested positive for prescribed medication. Strong medical evidence, expert toxicology testimony, and specialist legal arguments often result in not guilty verdicts or substantial penalty reductions for prescription medication cases.
Call now for free consultation: 0161 660 6050 – 24/7 advice for prescription drug driving charges.
Understanding Prescription Drug Driving Charges
Before mounting an effective prescription medication defence, understanding how the law applies to legitimate medical drug use is essential.
Section 5A and Prescription Medications
Drug driving legislation under Section 5A Road Traffic Act 1988 specifies legal limits for 17 controlled drugs, including nine prescription medications:
Prescription Drugs with Specified Limits:
- Morphine: 80 micrograms per litre (µg/L)
- Methadone: 500 µg/L
- Diazepam: 550 µg/L
- Temazepam: 1,000 µg/L
- Clonazepam: 50 µg/L
- Flunitrazepam: 300 µg/L
- Lorazepam: 100 µg/L
- Oxazepam: 300 µg/L
- Amphetamine: 250 µg/L
These limits are set higher than illegal drug limits, attempting to balance road safety with legitimate medical need. The limits represent blood concentrations considered to indicate either:
- Above-therapeutic doses suggesting misuse, or
- Levels likely to cause impairment even with prescription
Why Prescribed Patients Get Charged
You can be charged with a prescription medication driving offence despite a legitimate prescription if:
- Your blood level exceeds the specified limit for that drug
- You’re taking higher doses than standard therapeutic range
- You’re combining multiple prescription drugs
- You’re taking medication not prescribed to you
- Your prescription is outdated or no longer valid
The “Medical Defence” Provision
Importantly, Section 5A(3) provides a specific defence for prescribed medication: if you can prove the drug was prescribed, dispensed, supplied, or sold lawfully AND you took it in accordance with directions, you have a complete defence even if levels exceed limits.
This creates powerful defence opportunities – but requires compelling medical evidence and expert legal presentation.
To understand more about how criminal charges are brought and prosecuted, visit the Crown Prosecution Service website.
Common Prescription Medications Leading to Drug Driving Charges
Understanding which medications commonly result in charges helps patients recognise risks and mount appropriate defences.
Morphine and Opioid Pain Medications
Morphine Driving Charge Context:
Morphine is prescribed for moderate to severe pain management, particularly:
- Post-surgical recovery
- Chronic pain conditions (arthritis, fibromyalgia, neuropathy)
- Cancer pain management
- Palliative care
The specified limit (80 µg/L) represents high therapeutic range. Many patients taking prescribed morphine have blood levels below this. However, some situations exceed limits:
- Long-term high-dose pain management
- Immediate-release formulations taken shortly before driving
- Combination with other opioids
- Tolerance requiring higher doses
Morphine Defence Strategy:
- Obtain detailed prescribing history from pain specialist
- Medical evidence explaining necessity for high doses
- Expert toxicology on therapeutic ranges for chronic pain patients
- Proof of tolerance development requiring higher doses
- Evidence of stable, not increasing, dose regime
- Demonstration of no impairment despite therapeutic levels
Related Opioids: Similar defences apply for:
- Oxycodone
- Hydromorphone
- Fentanyl patches
- Codeine (metabolises to morphine)
- Tramadol
Benzodiazepines – Diazepam, Temazepam, and Others
Benzodiazepine Driving Defence:
Benzodiazepines are prescribed for:
- Anxiety disorders
- Panic attacks
- Insomnia (temazepam)
- Muscle spasm (diazepam)
- Seizure disorders (clonazepam)
- Alcohol withdrawal management
Diazepam (Valium): Limit: 550 µg/L – relatively high, but exceeded by:
- Long-term users with tolerance
- High-dose prescriptions for severe anxiety
- Accumulation in chronic users (long half-life)
Temazepam: Limit: 1,000 µg/L – the highest prescription drug limit, recognising:
- Hypnotic use before bedtime
- Shorter-acting formulation
- Lower impairment risk at therapeutic doses
Benzodiazepine Defence Arguments:
- Medical records documenting long-term legitimate prescription
- Tolerance development reducing impairment at levels affecting naive users
- Stable daily dosing not acute high-dose use
- Essential medication for mental health management
- Expert psychiatric evidence supporting necessity
- No alternative non-controlled medications effective
Methadone Maintenance Treatment
Methadone Driving Offence:
Methadone is prescribed for:
- Opioid dependency treatment programmes
- Chronic pain management
Limit: 500 µg/L – accommodating therapeutic doses in maintenance treatment
Methadone Defence Unique Factors:
- Prescribed as harm reduction treatment
- Patients often stabilised on consistent doses for years
- Tolerance means minimal impairment at therapeutic levels
- Essential for preventing return to illicit drug use
- Strong public health policy supporting methadone programmes
- Discrimination concerns if legitimate patients prosecuted
Defence Evidence:
- Prescribing clinic records showing supervised consumption
- Stability on consistent dose over time
- Negative tests for illicit opioid use
- Treatment provider testimony supporting driving fitness
- Expert evidence on tolerance and impairment thresholds
ADHD Medications – Amphetamines
Amphetamine Prescription Defence:
Amphetamines prescribed for:
- Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
- Narcolepsy
Common medications:
- Dexamphetamine (Dexedrine)
- Lisdexamfetamine (Elvanse)
- Methylphenidate (Ritalin, Concerta) – not amphetamine but similar
Limit: 250 µg/L for amphetamine
ADHD Medication Driving Context: Many ADHD patients are children/young adults who drive. Medication is essential for:
- Concentration and focus
- Impulse control
- Safe driving ability
Paradoxically, ADHD medication may improve driving safety compared to unmedicated ADHD.
Defence Strategy:
- Psychiatrist or specialist ADHD prescriber evidence
- Demonstrating medication necessity for safe driving
- Argument that medicated ADHD patient drives more safely than unmedicated
- Therapeutic levels consistent with prescribed dose
- No evidence of diversion or misuse
Medical Cannabis Driving Charge
Legal Prescription Medical Cannabis:
Since November 2018, medical cannabis can be prescribed by specialist doctors for:
- Chronic pain
- Multiple sclerosis spasticity
- Chemotherapy-induced nausea
- Epilepsy (where other treatments failed)
However, THC (the psychoactive component) has a legal driving limit of only 2 µg/L – extremely low and similar to illegal cannabis limits.
Medical Cannabis Defence Challenge:
This creates disproportionate situation:
- Legally prescribed medication
- Taken as directed for legitimate medical condition
- Yet, virtually any use results in levels exceeding driving limit
Defence Arguments:
- Human rights considerations (right to private life, discrimination)
- Proportionality of prosecution
- Medical necessity and lack of alternatives
- CBD-dominant preparations with minimal THC
- Therapeutic use exception under Section 5A(3)
- EU and domestic law on medical patient rights
Medical cannabis cases raise complex legal questions currently being tested in courts.
For more information about your legal rights, visit Gov.uk’s guide to your rights at the police station.
Building Comprehensive Prescription Medication Defence
Successful pharmaceutical defence solicitor representation requires multi-faceted approach combining medical evidence, legal argument, and expert testimony.
Gathering Medical Evidence
Essential Medical Documentation:
Prescription Records:
- GP prescription history showing ongoing prescribing
- Pharmacy dispensing records
- Prescription details (dose, frequency, duration)
- Evidence of regular prescription reviews
Medical Notes:
- GP records documenting medical condition requiring medication
- Specialist consultant letters and reports
- Hospital discharge summaries
- Diagnostic test results confirming condition
Prescribing Doctor Statement: Obtain detailed written statement from prescribing doctor addressing:
- Diagnosis necessitating medication
- Why this specific medication was chosen
- Dose determination rationale
- Expected therapeutic blood levels
- Regular monitoring and review process
- Patient compliance with directions
- Assessment of patient’s fitness to drive
- Opinion on impairment likelihood at prescribed doses
Specialist Consultant Evidence: For complex conditions, specialist evidence strengthens defence:
- Pain specialists for morphine/opioid prescriptions
- Psychiatrists for benzodiazepines and ADHD medications
- Addiction specialists for methadone treatment
- Neurologists for seizure medications
Expert Toxicology Evidence
Forensic Toxicologist Role:
Independent toxicology expert analyses:
- Whether detected blood levels are consistent with prescribed therapeutic dose
- Expected blood concentration ranges for long-term patients
- Tolerance effects in chronic medication users
- Timing of medication intake relative to driving
- Likelihood of impairment at detected levels
- Alternative explanations for results
Key Expert Evidence Points:
Therapeutic Range Analysis: Expert compares your blood level to published therapeutic ranges, demonstrating:
- Your level falls within expected therapeutic range
- Level consistent with prescribed dose, not excessive use
- No evidence of dose manipulation or misuse
Tolerance Consideration: Long-term medication users develop tolerance, meaning:
- Higher blood levels needed for therapeutic effect
- Less impairment at given level compared to naive users
- Stable long-term use indicates tolerance development
Timing Analysis: Expert calculations on drug pharmacokinetics show:
- When medication was likely taken based on blood level
- Whether level was rising (recent intake) or falling (elimination phase)
- Consistency with your claimed medication timing
Impairment Threshold Science: Literature review and expert opinion on:
- Scientific studies on impairment at various blood levels
- Distinction between drug presence and actual driving impairment
- Individual variation in impairment susceptibility
Legal Arguments for Prescribed Medication
Section 5A(3) Medical Defence:
The statutory medical defence requires proving:
- Drug was prescribed, dispensed, supplied, or sold lawfully
- Taken in accordance with advice/directions
If both elements proven, complete defence exists regardless of blood level.
Proving Lawful Prescription:
- Valid prescription from qualified prescriber
- Prescription current and in force at time of driving
- Medication obtained through legitimate pharmacy
- No evidence of prescription fraud or “doctor shopping”
Proving Compliance with Directions:
- Medication taken at prescribed dose and frequency
- No exceeding prescribed amounts
- Following prescriber’s instructions regarding driving
- Regular review appointments attended
Challenges Prosecution Must Overcome:
- Burden shifts to prosecution to disprove medical defence
- Prosecution must prove you exceeded directions or prescription invalid
- Strong medical evidence makes this difficult
Human Rights Considerations:
For prescribed medication cases, particularly medical cannabis, human rights arguments arise:
Article 8 – Right to Private Life:
- Includes right to manage your own health
- Criminalising legitimate medical treatment may be disproportionate interference
- Balancing public safety against individual medical autonomy
Article 14 – Discrimination:
- Disabled people requiring medication shouldn’t face greater restrictions
- Medical cannabis patients legally using prescribed treatment face discrimination vs other prescription drug users
Courts must consider proportionality – whether prosecution serves legitimate aim proportionate to interference with rights.
Demonstrating No Impairment
While Section 5A is an “absolute” offence not requiring impairment proof, demonstrating lack of impairment strengthens defence and mitigation:
Evidence of Normal Driving:
- Police observations of driving before stop
- CCTV footage showing normal driving behaviour
- Absence of collision, near-miss, or traffic violations
- Dashcam footage if available
Police Station Observations:
- Custody sergeant medical assessment notes
- Observations of behaviour, speech, coordination
- Absence of impairment indicators in custody records
Field Impairment Test Results: If FIT test conducted, analyse for:
- Passed tests demonstrating coordination
- Alternative explanations for “failed” tests (medical conditions, nervousness, fatigue)
- Subjectivity and unreliability of FIT tests
Independent Medical Assessment: Consider obtaining independent medical examination shortly after arrest documenting:
- Normal cognitive function
- Normal coordination and reflexes
- No clinical signs of impairment
- Medical opinion on driving fitness
For more information about how criminal courts work, visit Citizens Advice’s guide to criminal courts.
Prescription Drug Driving Case Study Examples
Understanding successful prescription drug driving defence examples illustrates winning strategies (all cases anonymised).
Case 1: Morphine for Chronic Pain
Facts:
- 55-year-old manual worker, long-term back pain following workplace injury
- Prescribed morphine sulphate 60mg twice daily for 3 years
- Stopped for minor traffic matter, roadside drug test positive
- Blood analysis: morphine 95 µg/L (limit 80 µg/L)
Defence:
- Pain specialist evidence documenting chronic condition and treatment necessity
- Pharmacy records proving consistent prescribed dosing
- Toxicology expert evidence that 95 µg/L consistent with therapeutic 60mg dose in long-term user
- Evidence of tolerance – patient functioned normally at this level
- Medical records showing regular prescribing reviews
- No evidence of impaired driving
Outcome: Not guilty verdict. Court accepted Section 5A(3) medical defence – medication lawfully prescribed and taken as directed. Expert evidence convinced magistrates that level reflected therapeutic use not misuse.
Case 2: Diazepam for Anxiety Disorder
Facts:
- 32-year-old with generalised anxiety disorder and panic attacks
- Prescribed diazepam 10mg three times daily by psychiatrist
- Blood level: 620 µg/L (limit 550 µg/L)
- Long-term stable prescription for 5 years
Defence:
- Psychiatric evidence of severe anxiety disorder requiring medication
- Documented tolerance from long-term use
- Expert evidence that 620 µg/L consistent with prescribed dose
- No alternative effective treatments tried
- Driving essential for employment
- No evidence of impairment or poor driving
Outcome: Guilty but exceptional hardship accepted. Court recognised legitimate medication but level exceeded limit. Exceptional hardship proven (job loss, family responsibilities). Ban reduced to 6 months from standard 12 months.
Case 3: Medical Cannabis for Multiple Sclerosis
Facts:
- 47-year-old with MS, prescribed medical cannabis oil for spasticity
- CBD-dominant preparation with small THC component
- Blood test: THC 3.5 µg/L (limit 2 µg/L)
- Prescription from specialist neurologist
Defence:
- Legal prescription for debilitating condition
- Medical necessity with limited alternatives
- Human rights arguments (discrimination against disabled medical cannabis patients)
- Section 5A(3) medical defence
- Minimal THC in CBD-focused formulation
- Expert evidence on impairment unlikely at this level
Outcome: Charges withdrawn by prosecution after defence representations. CPS recognised prosecution not in public interest given legitimate medical use and human rights considerations.
Case 4: Methadone Maintenance Treatment
Facts:
- 38-year-old in methadone maintenance programme for opioid dependency
- Stable dose 80mg daily for 2 years
- Blood level: 550 µg/L (limit 500 µg/L)
- Treatment clinic supervised administration
Defence:
- Addiction specialist evidence supporting methadone maintenance
- Supervised consumption records proving prescribed dosing
- Tolerance from long-term use
- Harm reduction treatment in public interest
- Driving essential for employment aiding recovery
- No illicit drug use
Outcome: Not guilty verdict. Court accepted medical defence and recognised importance of supporting recovery through methadone treatment. Public policy considerations favouring treatment compliance.
What to Do If Charged with Prescription Drug Driving
If facing prescription medication driving charges, immediate actions protect your defence.
At the Police Station:
Inform Police Immediately:
- Tell officers the detected drug is prescribed medication
- Provide prescription details (medication name, dose, prescriber)
- Don’t attempt detailed explanation without legal advice
- Request prescription documentation be noted
Contact Specialist Solicitor:
- Call immediately for police station representation
- Bring prescription bottles/documentation if possible
- Explain medication and prescribing circumstances
- Follow solicitor advice on evidential sampling
Our police station representation service ensures your prescription is properly documented from the start.
After Charge:
Gather Medical Evidence Immediately:
From GP:
- Full medical records
- Prescription history print-out
- Summary of condition and treatment
- Confirmation medication is current prescription
From Prescriber:
- Detailed letter explaining condition, medication necessity, and dosing
- Appointment records showing regular reviews
- Assessment of your compliance with directions
- Opinion on impairment likelihood
From Pharmacy:
- Dispensing records confirming prescription collection
- Dates and quantities proving compliance
- Evidence of consistent monthly prescriptions
From Specialist (if relevant):
- Consultant letters and reports
- Diagnostic test results
- Treatment plan documentation
Instruct Specialist Legal Representation:
Prescription drug driving defence requires specialist knowledge of:
- Drug driving law and medical defences
- Pharmaceutical science and therapeutics
- Medical evidence presentation
- Expert witness coordination
General criminal solicitors often lack this specialisation. Our pharmaceutical defence solicitor team focuses specifically on prescription medication cases.
Consider Expert Toxicologist:
Independent forensic toxicologist provides:
- Analysis of blood results in context of prescription
- Opinion on therapeutic levels vs misuse indicators
- Expert report for court
- Court testimony if trial proceeds
Gather Impairment Evidence:
Document evidence of no impairment:
- Obtain custody records showing medical assessment and behaviour observations
- Request dashcam or CCTV footage of driving
- Identify witnesses to normal behaviour
- Consider independent medical examination
Employment Considerations:
If prescription involves controlled drugs and you drive for work:
- Inform employer early (they’ll discover through DBS check eventually)
- Explain legitimate prescription
- Demonstrate commitment to fighting charges
- Explore non-driving alternative roles if necessary
Learn more about our experienced legal team and firm history.
Prescription Drug Driving Laws – Know Your Rights
Understanding your legal rights as prescribed medication patient facing drug driving charges is crucial.
Right to Medical Defence
Section 5A(3) Road Traffic Act provides specific defence for prescribed drugs. This is a complete defence if proven – you’re not guilty even if blood levels exceed limits.
Requirements:
- Prove drug lawfully prescribed/dispensed/supplied
- Prove taken in accordance with advice given
Burden of Proof: Initially on you to raise medical defence. Once raised with evidence, burden shifts to prosecution to disprove it beyond reasonable doubt.
Right to Independent Medical Evidence
You’re entitled to:
- Obtain your own medical records
- Commission independent medical assessments
- Instruct expert witnesses
- Present medical evidence at trial
Right to Challenge Test Results
Statutory option for blood sample division allows independent analysis verifying police results. Always exercise this right.
Right to Legal Representation
Free police station representation under legal aid regardless of income. Court representation legal aid available if you qualify financially.
Human Rights Protections
Article 6 – Fair Trial:
- Right to adequate time and facilities to prepare defence
- Right to examine prosecution witnesses
- Right to call defence witnesses
- Right to legal assistance
Article 8 – Private Life:
- Right to manage your own health and medical treatment
- Protection against disproportionate interference with medical autonomy
Disability Discrimination: Equality Act 2010 protections apply if your medical condition constitutes disability. Prosecution policies should consider:
- Discrimination against disabled people requiring medication
- Proportionality of prosecution
- Public interest considerations
- Reasonable adjustments
Data Protection Rights
Access to medical information:
- Right to obtain copies of your medical records
- Right to access police data held about you
- Right to disclosure of prosecution evidence
Appeals Rights
If convicted:
- Right to appeal conviction (to Crown Court)
- Right to appeal sentence
- Right to judicial review if legal errors occurred
For expert court representation services, contact our specialist team.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can you drive on prescribed medication in the UK?
Yes, you can legally drive while taking prescribed medication in the UK, provided you follow prescriber’s directions and blood levels don’t exceed legal limits. Many medications including morphine, diazepam, methadone, and medical cannabis can be taken while driving if prescribed legitimately. However, you must inform DVLA about certain medical conditions and medications, follow dosing instructions precisely, and not drive if impaired. If charged with prescription drug driving despite legitimate use, Section 5A(3) medical defence protects you if medication was lawfully prescribed and taken as directed. Expert legal representation can prove this defence.
What is the defence for prescription drug driving?
Section 5A(3) Road Traffic Act provides complete defence if you prove: (1) drug was lawfully prescribed, dispensed, supplied, or sold to you, and (2) you took it in accordance with directions/advice given. This defence applies even if blood levels exceed specified limits. Successful defence requires comprehensive medical evidence including prescription documentation, medical records, prescriber statements, and often expert toxicology evidence proving therapeutic levels consistent with prescribed dose. Pharmaceutical defence solicitor expertise is crucial for gathering and presenting this evidence effectively to secure not guilty verdicts.
Can I be prosecuted for taking prescription painkillers?
Yes, you can be prosecuted for drug driving even when taking legitimate prescription painkillers if blood levels exceed legal limits (morphine 80 µg/L). However, strong defences exist for prescription cases. If painkillers were lawfully prescribed for legitimate medical condition and taken as directed, Section 5A(3) medical defence applies. Successful defence requires: pain specialist evidence documenting medical necessity, pharmacy records proving prescribed dosing, expert toxicology showing therapeutic levels, and proof of compliance with prescribing directions. Many prescription painkiller cases result in not guilty verdicts or charge withdrawal with proper legal representation.
What happens if I’m on prescription drugs and drug driving?
If stopped and tested positive for prescription drugs while driving, you’ll be arrested and required to provide blood sample. Blood analysis determines if drug levels exceed legal limits. If charged, inform police immediately about prescription. Gather comprehensive medical evidence (prescription records, medical notes, prescriber statement). Instruct specialist solicitor who understands pharmaceutical defences. If you can prove medication was lawfully prescribed and taken as directed, medical defence under Section 5A(3) provides complete defence. Even if levels exceed limits, legitimate prescription cases often receive lenient sentencing (minimum 12-month ban, small fine) compared to illegal drug cases.
Can medical cannabis users drive legally?
Medical cannabis users face complex legal position. Medical cannabis is legally prescribed by specialist doctors for conditions like chronic pain, MS, and epilepsy. However, THC (psychoactive component) has legal driving limit of only 2 µg/L – extremely low. Virtually any medical cannabis use results in detectable THC above this limit. Defence arguments include: Section 5A(3) medical defence (lawfully prescribed, taken as directed), human rights considerations (discrimination against disabled patients), proportionality of prosecution, and medical necessity. Some medical cannabis cases have been withdrawn by prosecution recognising human rights concerns. This area of law is evolving through court challenges.
Does diazepam affect driving?
Diazepam (Valium) can affect driving ability, particularly when first prescribed or dose increased, as it causes drowsiness, slowed reactions, and impaired coordination. However, long-term users develop tolerance reducing these effects. Legal driving limit for diazepam is 550 µg/L – relatively high, accommodating therapeutic use. You can legally drive on prescribed diazepam if: taken as prescribed, not impaired, and blood levels below 550 µg/L. If charged with diazepam drug driving, defences include: legitimate prescription for anxiety/medical condition, tolerance from long-term use, therapeutic levels consistent with prescribed dose, and medical necessity. Always follow prescriber’s advice about driving.
What should I do if charged with prescription drug driving?
Immediately inform police the drug is prescribed medication. Provide prescription details. Request legal representation at police station – our service is free under legal aid. Gather comprehensive medical evidence: prescription records from GP/pharmacy, medical notes documenting condition, detailed prescriber statement explaining necessity and dosing, specialist consultant reports if applicable. Instruct specialist prescription drug driving defence solicitor experienced in pharmaceutical cases. Consider independent toxicology expert to analyse results. Don’t plead guilty without exploring medical defence under Section 5A(3). Many prescription cases result in not guilty verdicts or significantly reduced penalties with proper defence.
Can employers discriminate against prescription drug users?
Generally no. Equality Act 2010 protects employees with disabilities (including many conditions requiring prescription medication) from discrimination. Employers must make reasonable adjustments. However, if your role involves safety-critical driving and prescription medication genuinely impairs ability to drive safely, employer may have legitimate safety concerns. If convicted of prescription drug driving despite legitimate medication use, this is criminal conviction potentially triggering disciplinary proceedings. Proactive communication with employer, demonstrating legitimate medical use, and fighting charges vigorously helps protect employment. Some employers are understanding about prescription medication cases, especially first offences with strong medical evidence.
Get Expert Prescription Drug Driving Defence
If you’ve been charged with drug driving for legitimately prescribed medication, don’t accept conviction without fighting for your rights as a medical patient.
Why specialist defence matters:
Prescription medication cases require unique expertise combining:
- Understanding of pharmaceutical science
- Knowledge of therapeutic drug monitoring
- Experience with medical evidence
- Expertise in Section 5A(3) medical defence
- Access to leading toxicology experts
General motoring solicitors often lack this specialisation. Our pharmaceutical defence solicitor team focuses specifically on prescription medication cases.
Contact Scarsdale Solicitors immediately for expert criminal defence representation:
📞 24/7 Emergency Line: 0161 660 6050
📧 Email: Info@scarsdalesolicitors.com
📍 Office Address: Reed House, 3–4 Hunters Lane, Rochdale, Greater Manchester, OL16 1YL
🌐 Website: www.scarsdalesolicitors.com Or complete our online contact form for a callback within hours.
Or complete our online contact form for a callback within hours.
What we’ll do for you:
- Case Assessment: Review your prescription, medical condition, and charges
- Medical Evidence: Coordinate comprehensive evidence gathering from prescribers
- Expert Instruction: Arrange independent toxicology analysis and testimony
- Legal Strategy: Build compelling medical defence under Section 5A(3)
- Court Representation: Expert advocacy at magistrates’ court
- Mitigation: Even if convicted, minimise penalties through medical evidence
Success in prescription cases:
We’ve achieved:
- Not guilty verdicts through medical defence
- Charge withdrawals before trial
- Exceptional hardship arguments for prescribed patients
- Minimal penalties for therapeutic medication use
Don’t delay:
Medical evidence gathering takes time. Early instruction allows thorough preparation. Prescribers may need time to prepare detailed statements. Expert witness availability can affect hearing dates.
Learn more about our 24/7 emergency legal services.
Call Now: 0161 660 6050
You’re a patient, not a criminal. Get the specialist legal defence your legitimate medical situation deserves.
