Facing 12 points totting-up ban? Our specialists argue for exceptional hardship to save your licence. High success rate. Free case assessment. Call now.
High
Enter your details below for a free initial call.
You’ve been told that reaching 12 points on your licence means an automatic six-month ban. That’s what the law says, and that’s what most people believe. But it’s not the whole story.
Every year, thousands of drivers reach 12 points on licence but no ban is imposed because they successfully argue exceptional hardship. This isn’t a loophole or a technicality – it’s a legitimate part of UK motoring law that exists for good reason.
At Scarsdale Solicitors, we’re exceptional hardship specialists. We’ve helped drivers across England and Wales keep their licences when facing totting-up disqualification. If you’re looking at 12 points on licence but no ban seems impossible, we can assess your case and tell you honestly whether exceptional hardship could work for you.
Worried about losing your licence? Call +44 (0) 161 660 6050 for a free case assessment.
The totting-up system works like this: penalty points for motoring offences accumulate on your licence. When you reach 12 points within three years, courts must disqualify you for at least six months. This is called totting-up disqualification.
The minimum ban depends on whether you’ve been disqualified before:
These are minimums. Courts can ban you for longer if they think it’s appropriate.
But here’s where 12 points on licence but no ban becomes possible. Under Section 35 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988, courts have discretion not to disqualify if satisfied that there are “grounds for mitigating the normal consequences of the conviction” – in other words, exceptional hardship.
Exceptional hardship means hardship that goes beyond the ordinary consequences of losing your licence. Everyone who loses their licence faces inconvenience. That’s not exceptional. What courts look for is something more – hardship that would be particularly severe given your specific circumstances.
The word “exceptional” matters. Courts reject arguments based on:
These are things that anyone losing their licence would experience. For 12 points on licence but no ban, you need to show something beyond the norm.
Losing your job if no realistic alternative exists – Not just “I need my licence for work” but “I will definitely lose this specific job and cannot find comparable employment without driving”
Third parties who depend on you – Elderly relatives who need driving to medical appointments, disabled family members, children who would lose educational opportunities
Employees who would lose their jobs – If you run a business, and disqualification would mean laying off staff, their hardship counts too
Medical needs – You or dependants requiring transport for treatment that public transport cannot adequately provide
Unique circumstances – Factors specific to your situation that make disqualification disproportionately harsh
Courts consider all circumstances together. A combination of factors that individually might not suffice can collectively establish exceptional hardship.
Call +44 (0) 161 660 6050 to discuss your circumstances.
Successful exceptional hardship arguments require solid evidence. Courts hear these arguments regularly and can spot weak or exaggerated claims immediately.
If job loss is part of your case for 12 points on licence but no ban, you need:
Simply saying “I need my licence for work” doesn’t establish exceptional hardship. Your employer must confirm, in writing, that disqualification means dismissal.
If others depend on you, gather:
The hardship must be identifiable to people, not hypothetical or generalised.
If you run a business:
General character references help establish you as someone deserving of the court’s discretion, though they’re secondary to the specific hardship evidence.
If your case could result in 12 points, the court will ask whether you wish to argue exceptional hardship. This usually happens at the sentencing stage after a guilty plea or conviction.
Your solicitor presents the exceptional hardship argument to the magistrates or district judge. This includes:
The prosecution can challenge your evidence and argue that the hardship isn’t truly exceptional. Magistrates may ask questions.
Magistrates then decide whether exceptional hardship is established. If they accept your argument, they can either:
If they reject the argument, you receive the standard totting-up ban of at least six months.
There’s no appeal against their finding on exceptional hardship specifically – it’s a discretionary decision. However, the overall sentence can be appealed in some circumstances.
These examples illustrate what exceptional hardship looks like in practice. Each case is different, but the principles apply broadly.
A nurse had reached 11 points and faced her 12th point for speeding. She was the sole carer for her mother, who had multiple sclerosis and required regular hospital visits that public transport couldn’t accommodate. She also worked shifts at a hospital with limited public transport access.
The court accepted that her mother’s medical needs, combined with the difficulty of reaching work by other means, constituted exceptional hardship. Result: 12 points on licence but no ban.
A plumber who employed three people faced totting up. His work required travelling to customers’ homes throughout a rural area. He demonstrated that without his licence, he couldn’t complete jobs, the business would fail, and his employees would lose their positions.
The court accepted that the hardship extended to his employees, not just himself. Result: licence preserved through exceptional hardship.
A single father had three children at different schools with staggered start times. Public transport routes didn’t align with the school locations. His work also required driving, with no alternative positions available.
The combination of childcare complexity and employment needs established exceptional hardship. Result: 12 points on licence but no ban.
A sales executive argued for exceptional hardship because he needed to drive to work. His employer confirmed he would be redeployed to an office role during any ban. He said this would affect his career progression.
The court rejected this. Career inconvenience and temporary redeployment don’t constitute exceptional hardship – they’re the ordinary consequences anyone might face. Result: six-month ban imposed.
We’ve seen many exceptional hardship arguments fail because of avoidable errors.
Verbal assertions without documentation rarely succeed. If you claim you’ll lose your job, you need written confirmation from your employer. If you claim medical needs, you need medical evidence. Courts want to see proof, not just hear claims.
Overstating your hardship backfires. Magistrates know when people are exaggerating, and it damages their credibility on everything else. Be honest about your circumstances – genuine hardship is more persuasive than inflated claims.
“I need my licence for work, and life will be difficult” describes almost everyone facing a driving ban. That’s not exceptional. You need to show why your situation is different from the thousands of other drivers who lose their licences and manage.
If there’s an obvious counter to your argument (could you get a different job? Could someone else drive your relative?), address it proactively. Leaving holes for the prosecution to exploit weakens your case.
Exceptional hardship is argued in court, and how it’s presented matters. Rambling, disorganised submissions frustrate magistrates. Clear, logical presentation of evidence works better.
Talk to us before your hearing: +44 (0) 161 660 6050
Yes, but there are restrictions.
If you successfully argue exceptional hardship for one totting-up situation, you cannot rely on the same circumstances again within three years. The Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 specifically prevents this.
So if you argued that losing your job would cause exceptional hardship in 2024, you can’t use job loss again until 2027. You would need to present different hardship circumstances for any subsequent offence within that period.
This doesn’t mean exceptional hardship is once-only forever. After three years, or with genuinely different circumstances, you could potentially argue it again.
Courts also note when someone has repeatedly accumulated points. Multiple totting-up situations suggest a pattern of behaviour that makes magistrates less sympathetic to exceptional hardship arguments.
When you instruct Scarsdale Solicitors for an exceptional hardship case, here’s how we work:
We discuss your circumstances in detail and give you an honest view of whether exceptional hardship is likely to succeed. Some cases are strong candidates; others aren’t. We tell you the truth rather than what you want to hear.
We identify what evidence you need and help you obtain it. This might include employer letters, medical reports, business documentation, and third-party statements. We know what courts look for and ensure your evidence addresses it.
We prepare your case thoroughly, anticipating prosecution challenges and preparing responses. We organise your evidence logically and prepare the legal submissions.
We represent you at the hearing, presenting your exceptional hardship argument effectively. We handle questions from magistrates and respond to any prosecution points.
If successful, you keep your licence (though you’ll have 12+ points on it). If unsuccessful, we discuss appeal options or help you manage the disqualification period.
If you’re approaching 12 points, the timing of your court appearance matters. Points must be accumulated within three years of each other for the totting-up to apply.
If you have older points about to expire, delaying your court date until they’ve dropped off might mean the difference between totting up and a straightforward penalty. Equally, if you’re close to 12 points and commit another offence, you might face totting-up unexpectedly.
Points “expire” for totting purposes three years from the date of the offence, not the date of conviction. They remain on your licence for four years, but only count towards totting-up for three.
Strategic timing of court appearances is part of effective case management. Talk to us before accepting a court date if you’re in this position.
Understanding Speeding Offences
Sometimes the argument doesn’t succeed. Courts reject exceptional hardship when they don’t find the circumstances genuinely exceptional, or when the evidence is weak.
If you’re disqualified, you need to plan for life without your licence. Consider:
The ban period will end. Planning for it makes the time more manageable.
You can also check whether the conviction itself could be appealed, though the grounds for appeal are limited.
We’ve helped drivers across England and Wales achieve 12 points on licence but no ban through exceptional hardship. Our approach is:
Shazia Ali leads our motoring defence practice with over 20 years’ experience. She’s seen every type of exceptional hardship argument and knows how to present them effectively.
Contact Scarsdale Solicitors today:
Phone: +44 (0) 161 660 6050
Address: Reeds House, 3-4 Hunters Lane, Rochdale, OL16 1YL.
We represent clients nationwide across England and Wales.
Expert legal services in major cities, towns, and boroughs throughout England and Wales.
Understanding offences and process helps you make informed decisions about your future.
Yes. The law allows courts to avoid disqualification if exceptional hardship is established. Thousands of drivers keep their licences this way each year. Success depends on your specific circumstances and the strength of your evidence.
Hardship that goes beyond the ordinary consequences of losing your licence. This typically means job loss where no alternative exists, severe impact on third parties who depend on you, or unique circumstances that make disqualification disproportionately harsh.
Technically, yes, but success rates are much lower for self-represented defendants. Courts hear these arguments constantly and can distinguish well-prepared cases from weak ones. Professional representation significantly improves your chances.
12 points accumulated within three years of each other trigger totting-up disqualification. The three-year period runs from offence date to offence date, not conviction dates.
Six months for a first totting-up ban, 12 months if you've been disqualified for totting-up within the previous three years, and 24 months for third or subsequent bans within three years.
Only if you can prove you would definitely lose your job AND cannot find comparable alternative employment. Simply needing to drive for work isn't enough - that's ordinary hardship that many people face.
Yes. Hardship to third parties - family members, employees, dependants - can form part of an exceptional hardship argument. You need evidence of their specific needs and how disqualification would affect them.
Typically: employer letters confirming dismissal, medical records if health needs are relevant, business accounts if you're self-employed, statements from affected third parties, and documentation showing lack of alternatives to driving.
Not for the same circumstances within three years. If you successfully argued that job loss would cause exceptional hardship, you cannot rely on job loss again until three years have passed. Different circumstances could potentially be used sooner.
Success rates vary depending on case strength and how the argument is presented. Well-prepared cases with strong evidence succeed more often than weak cases with poor evidence. We only take cases with realistic prospects.
They remain on your licence. If you achieve 12 points on licence but no ban, you'll have 12+ points endorsed. Any further offences could quickly take you back to another totting-up situation.
Yes, courts will often grant short adjournments for exceptional hardship evidence gathering. It's better to ask for time than present an inadequately evidenced case.
No. Courts have discretion - they can accept or reject the argument. Strong evidence and proper preparation improve your chances but don't guarantee success.
If you're already disqualified when you receive the points that would trigger totting-up, the situation is complex. The points may or may not count depending on timing. Speak to a solicitor about your specific circumstances.
There's no direct appeal against the magistrates' discretionary decision on exceptional hardship. However, you may be able to appeal the overall sentence in certain circumstances.
As soon as possible. Evidence takes time to gather, and you don't want to rush preparation. If you know you're approaching 12 points, contact us before your next court date.
Yes. Exceptional hardship must be argued in court, and you'll need to be present. We represent you and make the submissions, but your attendance is required.
Yes, unless you're already disqualified for another reason. Your current licence remains valid until the court decides otherwise.
We discuss your circumstances, the points you've accumulated, and the potential hardship from disqualification. We then give you an honest assessment of whether exceptional hardship has realistic prospects in your case.
We charge fixed fees that vary depending on case complexity. Simple cases with clear evidence cost less than complex cases needing extensive preparation. We'll quote you a price after the free consultation.
Facing 12 points feels like the end of the road. But every year, drivers achieve 12 points on licence but no ban through exceptional hardship. If your circumstances are genuinely exceptional, you deserve a proper chance to argue your case.
The difference between keeping and losing your licence often comes down to preparation and presentation. Proper evidence, clear arguments, and professional advocacy make all the difference.
Call Scarsdale Solicitors on +44 (0) 161 660 6050 for your free assessment. We’ll tell you honestly whether exceptional hardship could work for you.
I would like to thank Shazia and the Scarsdale team. Super efficient, fast responding and knew exactly what to do in the situation I was in. Highly recommend for any immigration needs
I would like to thank Shazia and the Scarsdale team. Super efficient, fast responding and knew exactly what to do in the situation I was in. Highly recommend for any immigration needs
Dynamic Program Designer